I want to apologize up front. This is going to be long and I might ramble because I have a tendency to chase the rabbit down the hole when it crosses my path. I promised Luke I would comment upon the writings found upon this web site. I want it to be understood now that my comments are my opinion and should be scrutinized in that light. As I will caution anyone, study for yourself and see what the Word and the Spirit are telling you. I do not hold any belief that I hold some kind of final authority on the Word of G_d, but I am a student of His Word and I listen to the Spirit guide me.
The web page is the second chapter in a web-based book called “Yahshua (Jesus) and Judaism Versus Paul and Christianity” In his introduction he openly admits that what he has written will be viewed by most of the Christian world and the Jewish world as heresy. I can fully understand his trepidation as I have had those kinds of accusations hurled at me before because I am not orthodox in my thinking either, but that is about the extent of our similarities.
He seems to have three basic premises:
1) That Christianity in not an exclusive faith.
2) Salvation is earned merit based upon keeping the commandments and good works.
3) Paul has no authority and is in fact a false apostle.
The first two are covered pretty well in this chapter of his book. The third is covered elsewhere and I have not really read his thesis on that as of yet. I will but not today. I mention it here because it is important to his theology to destroy Paul’s credibility.
Christianity not being exclusive and merit based salvation are tied into one and are based upon the last two chapters of Revelation. He starts with a lengthy discussion of The Kingdom of Heaven and the New Jerusalem. He makes a case that only those who have kept the commandments (merit based salvation) will be able to live in the City and partake of the fruit trees of life. A larger group will live outside the City inhabiting the new earth those are the people who lived good lives but ultimately did not fulfill the commandments. The last group are those who were evil and are thrown into the lake of fire. I am not interested at this time in deconstructing this theory. I am more interested in his contradiction in how he got there.
He bases the second group on Matthew 7:21-23.
21 "Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.
22 "Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’
23 "And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.’
Matthew 7:21-23 NASB
Later in the chapter he is discussing erroneous Christian doctrines. The first one he tackles ends up contradicting his premise that there will be those who have worked miracles in the name of Yeshua, but are denied entrance to the City because they did not keep the commandments.
Understood Christian theology has the conversation between Nicodemus and Yeshua showing the need to be spiritually reborn in order to see or know the Kingdom of G_d. In essence A salvation through knowledge, faith, and regeneration of the Spirit. The writer makes the conversation out to be Nicodemus attempting to find out how Yeshua is able to perform the miracles he does. He goes on to explain that Yeshua makes the case that in order to perform these miracles one needs to be spiritually reborn and part of that is faith and keeping the commandments. I can hope you can see what I can see right here.
According to the writer In order to perform miracles one has to be “born again” and part of that is keep in the commandments, yet he also states that there are those who will perform these miracles but not be allowed in the City based upon their lack of keeping the commandments. You can’t have it both ways. These ideas are mutually exclusive. If they are then there has to be another explanation, and the writer is wrong. Based upon this shoddy work I am sure I will find other errors in his thinking as well. In fact I will also show that he is wrong about the exclusivity of our faith.
One of the well known scriptures in our faith is John 14:6.
6 Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.
John 14:6 NASB
When we discuss the exclusive nature of our faith this verse is the ultimate defense against those who would say otherwise. The writer makes a case that that we are using the verse out of context and that it in fact simply a reassurance to His followers that He is given all power to judge us and that as our final judge all have to go through Him. Valiant try but he is wrong again. John 14 is one of my favorite passages in the Word and has had significant influence upon my theological thinking. I am quite familiar with the context of that chapter and it has nothing to do with final judgment. The writer has used his own predisposed ideas to influence his translation of this passage of scripture.
Verses 6 through 11 are an answer to Thomas and Philip on how to follow Him and how to see or know the Father. More than that the verses from 12 through 15 are a disclosure on where our power in faith comes from with an admonition on how we show our love to Him.
1 ) "Do not let your heart be troubled; believe in God, believe also in Me.
2 ) "In My Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you.
3 ) "If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am, there you may be also.
4 ) "And you know the way where I am going."
5 ) Thomas said to Him, "Lord, we do not know where You are going, how do we know the way?"
6 ) Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.
7 )"If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also; from now on you know Him, and have seen Him."
8 ) Philip said to Him, "Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us."
9 ) Jesus said to him, "Have I been so long with you, and yet you have not come to know Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
10 ) "Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father is in Me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on My own initiative, but the Father abiding in Me does His works.
11) "Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father is in Me; otherwise believe because of the works themselves.
12 ) "Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes in Me, the works that I do, he will do also; and greater works than these he will do; because I go to the Father.
13 ) "Whatever you ask in My name, that will I do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
14 ) "If you ask Me anything in My name, I will do it.
15 ) "If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.
John 14:1-15 NASB
I have not gone and studied the writer’s case against Paul so I have no case yet to refute his assessment of Paul, but it is clear to me that in order to build his case he has to discredit Paul, as his writings are the most predominate in the New Testament. I will address the writer’s views on Paul at a later date.
All in all I would have to agree with the writer’s own assessment, he is a heretic and a dangerous one to boot. A man like this could easily sway those who do not know the Word or those with no Spirit given discernment. I would warn you against taking this person’s theology as gospel. Study the Word for yourself with no other person to influence your thoughts. This is the approach I have taken and I have learned much from the Spirit since going to the Source of inspiration for understanding of His Word.